I am wondering over the furor caused by author James Frey and his memoir/novel A Million Little Pieces. Oprah's flip-flopping between the offensive and the defensive, class action suits are being filed ("I never would have bought the book if I'd known it was fiction") and pundits from every corner of the library are putting in their two cents.
And it makes me wonder ...
If a book changes your life, does it matter whether it's fact or fiction?
Are we so hooked on "reality"-based programming that we have marginalized storytellers? Must everything worth reading be the truth, and its facts verifiable? If so, there goes the Bible, and probably 90% of what's worth reading in the library.
Finally, and most damning I think to the whole debate: what autobiography, memoir, remembrance, biography or other so-called "true life chronicle" has NO falsehood in it? No embellishment of the truth, no creative reinterpretation of past events, no dramatizing perspective that is except in the eyes of the teller an obvious stretching of the cold, hard facts? I would lay even money that the celebrated self-absorbed scribblings of Benjamin Franklin, Henry David Thoreau, Henry Adams ... hell, even Samuel Pepys and St. Augustine ... were NOT completely historically accurate. Not everything happened the way these chroniclers tell it. Does that make their memoirs less impressive, less effective, less informative, less inspirational or cautionary, less memoir and more fiction? No.
Why is it that we never seem to focus on anything important for more than five minutes, and yet can spend weeks haggling over the most ridiculous things?
I think it's because we are always looking for someone ELSE to take personal responsibility, so we don't have to. We as a culture fight awareness and attention with every breath, conscious and subconscious.